code-tour
- Use it when:
- You want an onboarding, architecture, PR, root-cause or security tour a reader can step through file by file.
- You get:
- A .tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour JSON file in Microsoft's CodeTour format, which opens each step at its file and line, with no change to the source code.
- It does:
- Explores the repo, picks a persona and step count, verifies every path and line, and sets the git ref so new files still open.
- Writes:
- Each step as situation, mechanism, implication and gotcha, along an arc from orientation to the core path to a next move.
- Unlike codebase-onboarding:
- That one, from ECC, is for broad onboarding without a tour file.
TL;DR
ECC's code-tour writes guided walkthroughs as CodeTour files instead of Markdown notes. It explores the repo first: README, entry points, folder structure, config and, for a PR tour, the changed files. It then infers the reader and depth from your request, from a 5-8 step vibe check to a 14-18 step architecture tour, with personas for new joiners, PR reviewers, root-cause investigators, security reviewers, feature explainers and bug fixers. Steps can anchor to a directory, a file and line, a selection, a text pattern for code that moves, or a URI such as the PR itself. Each description follows what it calls SMIG: the situation, the mechanism, the implication for this reader, and the gotcha a smart reader would miss. Before finishing it checks that every path and line exists and that the tour tells a story rather than listing files. It also explains the ref field: a PR tour pinned to the base branch can't open files the PR adds, so it points ref at the PR branch or leaves it out.
Summarizes the skill at d2ef268.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill code-tour skills.sh pageSource on GitHubAll skills from affaan-m/ecc
- Total Downloads
- 5,500 on skills.sh, Nov 9, 2026
- Repo stars
- 299,776 affaan-m/ecc
- First seen
- May 19, 2026 on skills.sh
Weekly values
| Week to | Installs |
|---|---|
| Sep 21 | 268 |
| Sep 28 | 166 |
| Oct 5 | 148 |
| Oct 12 | 241 |
| Oct 19 | 419 |
| Oct 26 | 412 |
| Nov 2 | 485 |
| Nov 9 | 449 |
| Category |
Articles, docs, internal comms, research write-ups and prose that doesn't read as generated. |
|---|---|
| Type |
A multi-step process the agent follows: interview, debug, run a TDD loop, review. |
| Effect |
Its own steps create or change files, git state or local tools. |
| Needs |
Instructions only. Works in any agent that supports skills. |
| Publisher |
Everyone else. Unverified vendor claims default to community. |
| Topics | |
| Stack |
SKILL.md
From affaan-m/ecc at d2ef268. Checked daily, last changed Nov 6, 2026.
Frontmatter
name: code-tour
description: Create CodeTour `.tour` files โ persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests. Use when the user asks for a code tour, onboarding walkthrough, PR tour, or an explanation of how a subsystem works.
metadata:
origin: ECCCode Tour
Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.
A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:
- what they are looking at
- why it matters
- what path they should follow next
Only create .tour JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
- the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
- the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
- the task is better served by a guided sequence than a flat summary
Examples:
- onboarding a new maintainer
- architecture tour for one service or package
- PR-review walk-through anchored to changed files
- RCA tour showing the failure path
- security review tour of trust boundaries and key checks
When NOT to Use
| Instead of code-tour | Use |
|---|---|
| A one-off explanation in chat is enough | answer directly |
The user wants prose docs, not a .tour artifact |
documentation-lookup or repo docs editing |
| The task is implementation or refactoring | do the implementation work |
| The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifact | codebase-onboarding |
Workflow
1. Discover
Explore the repo before writing anything:
- README and package/app entry points
- folder structure
- relevant config files
- the changed files if the tour is PR-focused
Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.
2. Infer the reader
Decide the persona and depth from the request.
| Request shape | Persona | Suggested depth |
|---|---|---|
| "onboarding", "new joiner" | new-joiner |
9-13 steps |
| "quick tour", "vibe check" | vibecoder |
5-8 steps |
| "architecture" | architect |
14-18 steps |
| "tour this PR" | pr-reviewer |
7-11 steps |
| "why did this break" | rca-investigator |
7-11 steps |
| "security review" | security-reviewer |
7-11 steps |
| "explain how this feature works" | feature-explainer |
7-11 steps |
| "debug this path" | bug-fixer |
7-11 steps |
3. Read and verify anchors
Every file path and line anchor must be real:
- confirm the file exists
- confirm the line numbers are in range
- if using a selection, verify the exact block
- if the file is volatile, prefer a pattern-based anchor
Never guess line numbers.
4. Write the .tour
Write to:
.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour
Keep the path deterministic and readable.
5. Validate
Before finishing:
- every referenced path exists
- every line or selection is valid
- the first step is anchored to a real file or directory
- the
refpoints at a branch or commit that actually has every file the tour references (see below) - the tour tells a coherent story rather than listing files
The ref Field
ref ties the tour to a git branch or commit. It matters more than it looks: when ref is not the branch the reader has checked out, CodeTour opens each step's file from that revision in git, not from the files on disk. If a file is not in that revision, the step will not open โ the reader sees "The editor could not be opened because the file was not found" even though the file is sitting right there. The tour and its comments still show, so the real cause is easy to miss.
Pick ref by tour type:
| Tour type | Set ref to |
|---|---|
| PR tour | the PR branch โ never the base branch |
| Onboarding / architecture | the branch the reader will be on (often main), or leave it out |
| Not sure | leave ref out, so CodeTour reads files straight from disk |
The PR case is the common trap: a PR usually adds new files, and new files do not exist on the base branch yet. Point ref at the base (e.g. develop) and every step on a new file fails to open.
Before finishing, confirm each step's file actually exists at the ref you chose.
Step Types
Content
Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:
{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }
Do not make the first step content-only.
Directory
Use to orient the reader to a module:
{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }
File + line
This is the default step type:
{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }
Selection
Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:
{
"file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
"selection": {
"start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
"end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
},
"title": "Request Pipeline",
"description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
}
Pattern
Use when exact lines may drift:
{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }
URI
Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:
{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }
Writing Rule: SMIG
Each description should answer:
- Situation: what the reader is looking at
- Mechanism: how it works
- Implication: why it matters for this persona
- Gotcha: what a smart reader might miss
Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.
Narrative Shape
Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:
- orientation
- module map
- core execution path
- edge case or gotcha
- closing / next move
The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.
Example
{
"$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
"title": "API Service Tour",
"description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
"ref": "main",
"steps": [
{
"directory": "src",
"title": "Source Root",
"description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
},
{
"file": "src/server.ts",
"line": 12,
"title": "Entry Point",
"description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
},
{
"file": "src/routes/payments.ts",
"line": 8,
"title": "Payment Routes",
"description": "Every payments request enters through this router before hitting service logic."
},
{
"title": "Next Steps",
"description": "You can now follow any payment request end to end with the main anchors in place."
}
]
}
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| Flat file listing | Tell a story with dependency between steps |
| Generic descriptions | Name the concrete code path or pattern |
| Guessed anchors | Verify every file and line first |
| Too many steps for a quick tour | Cut aggressively |
| First step is content-only | Anchor the first step to a real file or directory |
| Persona mismatch | Write for the actual reader, not a generic engineer |
Best Practices
- keep step count proportional to repo size and persona depth
- use directory steps for orientation, file steps for substance
- for PR tours, cover changed files first
- for monorepos, scope to the relevant packages instead of touring everything
- close with what the reader can now do, not a recap
Related Skills
codebase-onboardingcoding-standardscouncil- official upstream format:
microsoft/codetour