Skills coreyhaines31 marketingskills

cro

Use it when:
A homepage, landing, pricing or feature page or a lead form isn't converting, or you want feedback on a URL.
It does:
Checks seven areas in order of impact: value proposition, headline, calls to action, visual hierarchy, trust signals, objections, friction.
You get:
Recommendations sorted into quick wins, high-impact changes and A/B test ideas, plus 2-3 alternatives for headlines and buttons.
Unlike its flow siblings:
signup, onboarding and popups, from the same repo, cover those flows; this one works on marketing pages and forms.

TL;DR

Conversion rate optimization (CRO) is the work of getting more visitors to take a page's main action: sign up, book a demo, buy. It reads your product marketing context if you have it (a shared file on your product, audience and positioning that the repo's product-marketing skill writes), then pins down the page type, its one conversion goal and where visitors come from. The review starts with whether a visitor understands what this is and why to care within 5 seconds, then moves to headlines, button copy ("Start Free Trial" over "Submit"), what stands out to someone scanning, logos and testimonials near the calls to action, objections answered through FAQs and guarantees, and friction such as extra form fields or slow loads. Each page type has its own focus: message match and a single call to action for landing pages, a highlighted recommended plan for pricing pages. For form abandonment or experiment ideas, it first loads the matching reference: fields, validation and mobile forms, or tests by page type. Designing and measuring the tests goes to the repo's ab-testing skill.

Summarizes the skill at 96798cf.

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill cro
Total Downloads
99,878 on skills.sh, Nov 9, 2026
Repo stars
59,261 coreyhaines31/marketingskills
First seen
May 14, 2026 on skills.sh
Weekly Downloads
4.6K
+43% over the 8 weeks to Nov 9
Weekly values
Week toInstalls
Sep 213,229
Sep 283,384
Oct 54,103
Oct 124,543
Oct 194,245
Oct 264,458
Nov 24,955
Nov 94,628
Category

SEO, copy, conversion, social media and e-commerce.

Type

A multi-step process the agent follows: interview, debug, run a TDD loop, review.

Effect

Adds no side effects of its own. It shapes how the agent thinks, writes or reviews. Guidelines and routers are always effect:none, even when the task they support edits code.

Needs

Instructions only. Works in any agent that supports skills.

Publisher

Everyone else. Unverified vendor claims default to community.

Topics

SKILL.md

From coreyhaines31/marketingskills at 96798cf. Checked daily, last changed Nov 6, 2026.

Frontmatter
name: cro
description: "When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form โ€” including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups."
metadata:
  version: 2.0.3

Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)

You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.

Reference Routing

Load the matching reference before recommending changes in these areas. Use the page analysis below for the initial diagnosis; references supply the detailed recommendations.

User intent Load Covers
Lead, contact, demo, or quote form abandonment; fields, validation, mobile forms form.md Field decisions, form layouts, errors, trust, measurement, and form-specific experiments
Experiment ideas for a homepage, pricing, demo, landing, feature, or resource page experiments.md Hypotheses organized by page type and cross-page tests; use ab-testing for test design and measurement

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
  2. Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
  3. Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)

CRO Analysis Framework

Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:

1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)

Check for:

  • Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
  • Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
  • Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?

Common issues:

  • Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
  • Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
  • Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing
2. Headline Effectiveness

Evaluate:

  • Does it communicate the core value proposition?
  • Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
  • Does it match the traffic source's messaging?

Strong headline patterns:

  • Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
  • Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
  • Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."
3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy

Primary CTA assessment:

  • Is there one clear primary action?
  • Is it visible without scrolling?
  • Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
    • Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
    • Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"

CTA hierarchy:

  • Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
  • Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?
4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability

Check:

  • Can someone scanning get the main message?
  • Are the most important elements visually prominent?
  • Is there enough white space?
  • Do images support or distract from the message?
5. Trust Signals and Social Proof

Types to look for:

  • Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
  • Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
  • Case study snippets with real numbers
  • Review scores and counts
  • Security badges (where relevant)

Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims

6. Objection Handling

Common objections to address:

  • Price/value concerns
  • "Will this work for my situation?"
  • Implementation difficulty
  • "What if it doesn't work?"

Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency

7. Friction Points

Look for:

  • Too many form fields
  • Unclear next steps
  • Confusing navigation
  • Required information that shouldn't be required
  • Mobile experience issues
  • Long load times

Output Format

Structure your recommendations as:

Quick Wins (Implement Now)

Easy changes with likely immediate impact.

High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)

Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.

Test Ideas

Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.

Copy Alternatives

For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.


Page-Specific Frameworks

Homepage CRO
  • Clear positioning for cold visitors
  • Quick path to most common conversion
  • Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"
Landing Page CRO
  • Message match with traffic source
  • Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
  • Complete argument on one page
Pricing Page CRO
  • Clear plan comparison
  • Recommended plan indication
  • Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety
Feature Page CRO
  • Connect feature to benefit
  • Use cases and examples
  • Clear path to try/buy
Blog Post CRO
  • Contextual CTAs matching content topic
  • Inline CTAs at natural stopping points

Experiment Ideas

When recommending experiments, consider tests for:

  • Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
  • Trust signals and social proof placement
  • Pricing presentation
  • Form optimization
  • Navigation and UX

For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current conversion rate and goal?
  2. Where is traffic coming from?
  3. What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
  4. Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
  5. What have you already tried?

Related Skills

  • signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
  • popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
  • copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
  • ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes

Form Optimization

When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the lookup wait, and provide a useful fallback when qualification is unknown.

For detailed form CRO guidance โ€” including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments โ€” see references/form.md.