prompt-engineering-patterns
- Use it when:
- You're writing, optimizing or debugging the prompts inside an LLM application, or a prompt gives inconsistent or unparseable output.
- It does:
- Covers few-shot example selection, chain-of-thought with self-verification, structured outputs with Pydantic, prompt templates, system prompts and recovery from malformed output.
- You get:
- Prompts built from those patterns, and metrics to track them by: accuracy, consistency, latency, token use and the share of valid outputs.
- Works with:
- Python, with examples that use the Anthropic SDK and LangChain.
TL;DR
A reference for prompts that run inside an application rather than in a chat. Its patterns: few-shot prompting with examples picked by semantic similarity, chain-of-thought with a verification step, structured outputs enforced by a Pydantic schema, progressive disclosure (start with a plain instruction and add constraints, reasoning, then examples only when needed), recovery when output fails to parse, and role-based system prompts. It also shows prompts combined with retrieval (RAG) and with validation, shorter prompts that save tokens, and caching a long system prompt. Best practices: be specific, show examples rather than describe, enforce schemas, test on varied inputs, and version prompts like code. Pitfalls include starting complex, examples that don't match the task, overflowing the context window and assuming output is always well-formed.
Summarizes the skill at 4bde316.
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill prompt-engineering-patterns skills.sh pageSource on GitHubAll skills from wshobson/agents
- Total Downloads
- 24,200 on skills.sh, Nov 9, 2026
- Repo stars
- 42,334 wshobson/agents
- First seen
- Jan 20, 2026 on skills.sh
Weekly values
| Week to | Installs |
|---|---|
| Sep 21 | 370 |
| Sep 28 | 383 |
| Oct 5 | 396 |
| Oct 12 | 389 |
| Oct 19 | 411 |
| Oct 26 | 390 |
| Nov 2 | 365 |
| Nov 9 | 340 |
| Category |
Build agents, orchestrate workers and give agents memory. Everything for building software: planning, coding, debugging, design, frameworks, cloud, agents and skills. |
|---|---|
| Type |
Knowledge and rules the agent applies while it works: best practices, design principles, API references. |
| Effect |
Adds no side effects of its own. It shapes how the agent thinks, writes or reviews. Guidelines and routers are always effect:none, even when the task they support edits code. |
| Needs |
Instructions only. Works in any agent that supports skills. |
| Publisher |
Everyone else. Unverified vendor claims default to community. |
| Topics | |
| Stack |
SKILL.md
From wshobson/agents at 4bde316. Checked daily, last changed Nov 6, 2026.
Frontmatter
name: prompt-engineering-patterns
description: >-
This skill should be used when the user asks to "optimize a prompt", "improve prompt
performance", "design a prompt template", "write better prompts", "debug prompt issues", "use
chain-of-thought", "structured prompting", "few-shot prompting", or wants to apply advanced
prompt engineering patterns for production LLM applications.Prompt Engineering Patterns
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing complex prompts for production LLM applications
- Optimizing prompt performance and consistency
- Implementing structured reasoning patterns (chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought)
- Building few-shot learning systems with dynamic example selection
- Creating reusable prompt templates with variable interpolation
- Debugging and refining prompts that produce inconsistent outputs
- Implementing system prompts for specialized AI assistants
- Using structured outputs (JSON mode) for reliable parsing
Core Capabilities
1. Few-Shot Learning
- Example selection strategies (semantic similarity, diversity sampling)
- Balancing example count with context window constraints
- Constructing effective demonstrations with input-output pairs
- Dynamic example retrieval from knowledge bases
- Handling edge cases through strategic example selection
2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- Step-by-step reasoning elicitation
- Zero-shot CoT with "Let's think step by step"
- Few-shot CoT with reasoning traces
- Self-consistency techniques (sampling multiple reasoning paths)
- Verification and validation steps
3. Structured Outputs
- JSON mode for reliable parsing
- Pydantic schema enforcement
- Type-safe response handling
- Error handling for malformed outputs
4. Prompt Optimization
- Iterative refinement workflows
- A/B testing prompt variations
- Measuring prompt performance metrics (accuracy, consistency, latency)
- Reducing token usage while maintaining quality
- Handling edge cases and failure modes
5. Template Systems
- Variable interpolation and formatting
- Conditional prompt sections
- Multi-turn conversation templates
- Role-based prompt composition
- Modular prompt components
6. System Prompt Design
- Setting model behavior and constraints
- Defining output formats and structure
- Establishing role and expertise
- Safety guidelines and content policies
- Context setting and background information
Quick Start
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
# Define structured output schema
class SQLQuery(BaseModel):
query: str = Field(description="The SQL query")
explanation: str = Field(description="Brief explanation of what the query does")
tables_used: list[str] = Field(description="List of tables referenced")
# Initialize model with structured output
llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-5")
structured_llm = llm.with_structured_output(SQLQuery)
# Create prompt template
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([
("system", """You are an expert SQL developer. Generate efficient, secure SQL queries.
Always use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
Explain your reasoning briefly."""),
("user", "Convert this to SQL: {query}")
])
# Create chain
chain = prompt | structured_llm
# Use
result = await chain.ainvoke({
"query": "Find all users who registered in the last 30 days"
})
print(result.query)
print(result.explanation)
Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Best Practices
- Be Specific: Vague prompts produce inconsistent results
- Show, Don't Tell: Examples are more effective than descriptions
- Use Structured Outputs: Enforce schemas with Pydantic for reliability
- Test Extensively: Evaluate on diverse, representative inputs
- Iterate Rapidly: Small changes can have large impacts
- Monitor Performance: Track metrics in production
- Version Control: Treat prompts as code with proper versioning
- Document Intent: Explain why prompts are structured as they are
Common Pitfalls
- Over-engineering: Starting with complex prompts before trying simple ones
- Example pollution: Using examples that don't match the target task
- Context overflow: Exceeding token limits with excessive examples
- Ambiguous instructions: Leaving room for multiple interpretations
- Ignoring edge cases: Not testing on unusual or boundary inputs
- No error handling: Assuming outputs will always be well-formed
- Hardcoded values: Not parameterizing prompts for reuse
Success Metrics
Track these KPIs for your prompts:
- Accuracy: Correctness of outputs
- Consistency: Reproducibility across similar inputs
- Latency: Response time (P50, P95, P99)
- Token Usage: Average tokens per request
- Success Rate: Percentage of valid, parseable outputs
- User Satisfaction: Ratings and feedback