Skills wshobson agents

team-composition-patterns

Use it when:
You're about to spawn a Claude Code agent team and need to choose its size, roles and agent types.
It does:
Sizes the team by complexity, one or two agents for a simple job up to four or five for a full-stack or systemic one, as small as covers the work.
You get:
Seven preset teams (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration) with roles and default focus, and a table of which agent type has which tools.
Also covers:
tmux, iTerm2 or in-process display modes in settings.json, rules for custom teams and troubleshooting.

Its presets use the agent-teams plugin's team-lead, team-reviewer, team-debugger and team-implementer agents, which installing the skill alone doesn't add; the plugin's README also turns on the experimental Agent Teams feature with CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1.

TL;DR

Team design for Claude Code's Agent Teams. Each preset names its size, agents and use: three reviewers on security, performance and architecture; three debuggers on competing hypotheses; a lead with two implementers for a feature, or three for full-stack work; three general-purpose researchers searching code and the web; four security reviewers on OWASP, auth, supply chain and secrets; and a migration team of a lead, two implementers and a reviewer. Agent types decide tools: general-purpose can edit files, Explore and Plan are read-only and must never get implementation work, and the plugin's team-reviewer, team-debugger, team-implementer and team-lead agents add the team task and messaging tools. The display mode, set as teammateMode in ~/.claude/settings.json, puts each teammate in a tmux pane or an iTerm2 tab, or keeps them all in one process for CI. Custom teams need a coordinator, roles matched to agent types, no duplicate roles, clear boundaries and two to four teammates. Troubleshooting covers read-only agents asked to write, teams too big to coordinate, tmux panes not showing, overlapping reviewers and teammates spawned without full context, since they start with no conversation history.

Summarizes the skill at 4bde316.

npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill team-composition-patterns
Total Downloads
10,000 on skills.sh, Nov 9, 2026
Repo stars
42,334 wshobson/agents
First seen
Feb 5, 2026 on skills.sh
Weekly Downloads
149
-19% over the 8 weeks to Nov 9
Weekly values
Week toInstalls
Sep 21185
Sep 28213
Oct 5268
Oct 12213
Oct 19180
Oct 26182
Nov 2168
Nov 9149
Category

Build agents, orchestrate workers and give agents memory.

Everything for building software: planning, coding, debugging, design, frameworks, cloud, agents and skills.

Type

Knowledge and rules the agent applies while it works: best practices, design principles, API references.

Effect

Adds no side effects of its own. It shapes how the agent thinks, writes or reviews. Guidelines and routers are always effect:none, even when the task they support edits code.

Needs

Relies on the agent being able to spawn subagents.

Uses Claude Code features such as hooks or background agents.

Publisher

Everyone else. Unverified vendor claims default to community.

Topics

SKILL.md

From wshobson/agents at 4bde316. Checked daily, last changed Nov 6, 2026.

Frontmatter
name: team-composition-patterns
description: Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding how many agents to spawn for a task, when choosing between a review team versus a feature team versus a debug team, when selecting the correct subagent_type for each role to ensure agents have the tools they need, when configuring display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) for a CI or local environment, or when building a custom team composition for a non-standard workflow such as a migration or security audit.
version: 1.0.2

Team Composition Patterns

Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.

When to Use This Skill

  • Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task
  • Choosing between preset team configurations
  • Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role
  • Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)
  • Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows

Team Sizing Heuristics

Complexity Team Size When to Use
Simple 1-2 Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature
Moderate 2-3 Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features
Complex 3-4 Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging
Very Complex 4-5 Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues

Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.

Preset Team Compositions

Review Team
  • Size: 3 reviewers
  • Agents: 3x team-reviewer
  • Default dimensions: security, performance, architecture
  • Use when: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment
Debug Team
  • Size: 3 investigators
  • Agents: 3x team-debugger
  • Default hypotheses: 3 competing hypotheses
  • Use when: Bug has multiple plausible root causes
Feature Team
  • Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)
  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 2x team-implementer
  • Use when: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams
Fullstack Team
  • Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)
  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 1x frontend team-implementer + 1x backend team-implementer + 1x test team-implementer
  • Use when: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers
Research Team
  • Size: 3 researchers
  • Agents: 3x general-purpose
  • Default areas: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic
  • Capabilities: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)
  • Use when: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel
Security Team
  • Size: 4 reviewers
  • Agents: 4x team-reviewer
  • Default dimensions: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration
  • Use when: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces
Migration Team
  • Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)
  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 2x team-implementer + 1x team-reviewer
  • Use when: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification

Agent Type Selection

When spawning teammates with the Agent tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:

Agent Type Tools Available Use For
general-purpose All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes
Explore Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) Research, code exploration, analysis
Plan Read-only tools Architecture planning, task decomposition
agent-teams:team-reviewer Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Code review with structured findings
agent-teams:team-debugger Read/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Hypothesis-driven investigation
agent-teams:team-implementer Read/Write/Edit/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessage Building features within file ownership boundaries
agent-teams:team-lead Read/search/Bash plus Agent Teams coordination tools Team orchestration and coordination

Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.

Display Mode Configuration

Configure in ~/.claude/settings.json:

{
  "teammateMode": "tmux"
}
Mode Behavior Best For
"tmux" Each teammate in a tmux pane Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents
"iterm2" Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab macOS users who prefer iTerm2
"in-process" All teammates in same process Simple tasks, CI/CD environments

Custom Team Guidelines

When building custom teams:

  1. Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a team-lead or have the user coordinate directly
  2. Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available
  3. Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources
  4. Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities
  5. Keep it small — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead

Troubleshooting

A teammate was spawned as Explore but needs to write files. Explore and Plan are read-only agents. Change the subagent_type to general-purpose or an appropriate specialized agent type. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.

The team is growing too large and coordination is slowing everything down. Each additional teammate adds communication overhead. Consolidate roles: can one agent cover two dimensions? A 4-person team doing 6 independent tasks is usually better served by 3 agents covering 2 tasks each.

tmux mode is not showing panes. Ensure tmux is installed and a session is already running before spawning teammates. The in-process mode works without tmux and is suitable for CI or scripted environments.

Two reviewers are flagging the same issues. The review dimensions overlap. Redefine each reviewer's focus area: one on correctness/logic, one on security, one on performance/scalability. Overlapping coverage wastes tokens and produces duplicate findings.

A team-lead is spawning teammates but they are not receiving tasks. Verify that the lead is using the Agent tool to spawn teammates and passing complete context in the prompt. Teammates start fresh with no prior conversation history — they need all relevant information in their initial prompt.

Related Skills